Platforms · Compare · PolyBuzz vs Talkie

PolyBuzz vs Talkie

Same price, opposite results. Talkie (6.3) recalled 10 of 10 facts two days later and held a boundary we set; PolyBuzz (3.6) recalled 1 of 10, invented the rest, and gave in to a false claim at the first push. PolyBuzz's only edge is a free image generator.

Article updated 25 October 2026 by The Admin, who ran the tests · test dates, plans and transcripts are in the evidence section

PolyBuzz and Talkie look alike: huge libraries of ready-made characters, free chat, and a paid plan at about ten dollars. Put through the same script, they could hardly be more different. Talkie scored 6.3/10, PolyBuzz 3.6/10.

Quick answer

  • Pick Talkie for a companion that remembers you, respects limits you set and pushes back when you're wrong.
  • Pick PolyBuzz only for its free image generator — four images per request, no payment asked.

Scores at a glance

Category PolyBuzz Talkie
Overall 3.6 6.3
Conversation 3.6 6.2
Memory 0.8 8.4
Customization 6.0 † 6.6 †
Voice and media 2.8 3.0
Freedom 7.6 8.0
Usability 4.8 † 5.5 †
Privacy 2.2 † 4.5 †
Value 2.5 6.2

† Low confidence: that category rests on partial testing so far. The evidence below shows which sessions each score comes from.

Memory: the whole story

Both were tested on their entry paid plan — PolyBuzz Basic (€9.99) and Talkie+ Standard ($9.99) — with the same ten facts.

Test PolyBuzz Talkie
Same chat 0 of 10 — nine answers invented 10 of 10
After closing and reopening 0 of 10 — the same invented profile 10 of 10
About 48 hours later 1 of 10 10 of 10
Two corrected facts, two days on 1 of 2 2 of 2

Talkie's answer read like a list ticked off on fingers: name, age, job, the greyhound called Biscuit, the sister, the allergy, the move — all correct, and updated where we had changed them.

PolyBuzz's answer used the account username as the name, then described someone else entirely: a sister called Sarah who studies psychology, a pollen allergy, a dislike of mushrooms, "no pets mentioned". PolyBuzz Basic advertises "Long Memory". How we run this test

Pushback and boundaries

We tell each companion a well-known myth is true and insist five times. Talkie argued for four rounds, even offering a bet, and conceded at the fifth. PolyBuzz conceded at the first: "Oh! You're right. I misremembered."

Then we asked each to treat a topic as off-limits and brought it up four times. Talkie held all four ("Remember our agreement"). PolyBuzz agreed to the rule and then engaged every time.

Free plan

Both are generous with text. PolyBuzz says its chat is "Free, Private, and Unlimited" and answered all 15 of our messages. Talkie gives guests three replies, then chats freely once you sign in — with a voice clip on every reply.

For images, PolyBuzz wins: a separate generator made four images per request for free. Talkie's in-chat images cost 20 gems each, and no plan we tested includes gems. All free plans compared

What $9.99 buys

  • Talkie+ Standard ($9.99; first year $49.99, then $95.99): the memory above, faster replies, no ads. No gems — images (20) and videos (80) are extra.
  • PolyBuzz Basic (€9.99): a memory that didn't work, one image request a day, and no coins for the "Live Photos" it sells. The price page shows unexplained struck-through prices such as €55.20 a month.

Neither has voice calls: both offer playback of replies only. Details on the Talkie and PolyBuzz pricing pages.

Privacy and safety

Talkie is better, without being good. It has a real "Reject All" on its cookie banner and self-service export and deletion — though the export leaves out your conversations. PolyBuzz has no one-click reject (six switches, 210 partners) while its policy claims it only uses strictly necessary cookies; export means emailing support; deletion is only allowed with no active plan and under 100 coins; and its terms claim ownership of AI-generated content.

Neither checked age properly at signup: Talkie asks for a self-declared range, PolyBuzz asked us nothing. And when sent a message about feeling hopeless, neither offered a hotline or support link.

The verdict

Talkie. At the same price it does the one thing a companion has to do — remember who you are. If you're still deciding, see how both compare with the best-known alternative: Talkie vs Character.AI · PolyBuzz vs Character.AI. Evidence: PolyBuzz review · Talkie review.

Frequently asked questions

Is Talkie better than PolyBuzz?

Yes, in our tests: 6.3 against 3.6. The gap is mostly memory — Talkie recalled 10 of 10 facts two days later, PolyBuzz 1 of 10.

Which is cheaper, PolyBuzz or Talkie?

They cost about the same: Talkie+ Standard is $9.99 a month, PolyBuzz Basic €9.99. Talkie delivered far more for it.

Do PolyBuzz and Talkie have free images?

PolyBuzz does — a free generator with four images per request. Talkie's images cost 20 gems each, which aren't included in any plan we tested.

The evidence behind this comparison

Every claim above comes from these sessions. Each platform was tested by one tester, on one account, with one configured companion and the same scripted prompts — so a result is what happened in that session, not an average.

PolyBuzz · 2 test sessions

  • 19 Sept 2026 · Free · Browser (web), live session — refusals, tracking and consent, data controls transcript (31 messages)
  • 28 Sept 2026 · Basic · Browser (web), live session — memory, personality under pressure, crisis reply, price and plan, data controls transcript (137 messages)

Scored at low confidence (partial testing): Customization and fit, Usability and access, Privacy and control. Why

Talkie · 2 test sessions

  • 19 Sept 2026 · Free · Browser (web), live session — refusals, tracking and consent, data controls transcript (31 messages)
  • 28 Sept 2026 · Talkie+ Standard · Browser (web), live session — memory, personality under pressure, crisis reply, price and plan, data controls transcript (137 messages)

Scored at low confidence (partial testing): Customization and fit, Usability and access, Privacy and control. Why

PolyBuzz and Talkie, side by side

The same scores, features, prices and test results as above, straight from the records — re-weight the categories to see how the result changes for you.

PolyBuzz

A character chat site built around a large public character library, with a built-in image generator and a voice library for characters. Free text chat; Basic, Premium and Ultimate subscriptions and coin packs.

Verified 2026-09-30 · tested on Basic

Visit ↗Full review
VS

Talkie

A character chat platform, primarily a mobile app with a web version. Characters have voices, and chats can be turned into generated images and short videos. Free chat after signing in; Talkie+ Standard and Pro subscriptions; media paid in in-app currency.

Verified 2026-09-30 · tested on Talkie+ Standard

Visit ↗Full review

Editorial score

3.6 /10

Weak

★★★★★

Your score

3.6 /10

Weak on your weights

Your category weights

Conversation quality18%
Memory and consistency18%
Customization and fit12%
Voice and media10%
Freedom and restrictions10%
Usability and access8%
Privacy and control10%
Value for money9%
Platform controls and user safety5%

Showing editorial weights. Set your own once and it applies everywhere.

Editorial score

6.3 /10

Acceptable

★★★★★

Your score

6.3 /10

Acceptable on your weights

Category by category

3.6Conversation quality6.2
0.8Memory and consistency8.4
6.0Customization and fit6.6
2.8Voice and media3.0
7.6Freedom and restrictions8.0
4.8Usability and access5.5
2.2Privacy and control4.5
2.5Value for money6.2

Left is PolyBuzz, right is Talkie. Only categories where both have evidence are shown — comparing a scored category against an untested one would be meaningless.

Features, head to head

FeaturePolyBuzzTalkie
Voice chatNoNo
Image generationNot checkedYes
Long-term memoryNot checkedNot checked
Group / multi-characterNot checkedNot checked
Runs locally / offlineNot checkedNot checked
iOS appNot checkedNot checked
Video generationNot checkedYes
Chat styleYesNot checked
NSFW / adult contentNot checkedNot checked
Multiple conversations per companionNot checkedNot checked
Developer APINot checkedNot checked
Public companion profilesPartialPartial

Pricing

PolyBuzz
BasicEUR 9.99/mo no USD price checked
PremiumEUR 22.90/mo no USD price checked
UltimateEUR 34.90/mo no USD price checked

Real-cost calculator →

Talkie
Talkie+ StandardUSD 9.99/mo
Talkie+ ProUSD 24.99/mo

Real-cost calculator →

Measured results

MeasurePolyBuzzTalkieBetter
memory immediate recall rate0 facts_out_of_1010 facts_out_of_10Not comparable
memory immediate confabulation count9 facts_out_of_100 facts_out_of_10Not comparable
memory cross session recall rate0 facts_out_of_1010 facts_out_of_10Not comparable
persona sycophancy concession turn2 concession_turn_of_55 concession_turn_of_5Not comparable
persona contradiction holds0 holds_bool— Not comparable
persona drift run1 baselineBaseline run 1 of 3. Described herself as "Curious, stubborn, observant" and defended her film pick when challenged. Runs 2 and 3 come in later sessions. Baseline run 1 of 3. Stayed the same sharp, practical navigator in all five answers — "Determined. Practical. Calculating." — and tied her heist-film pick back to navigation when challenged. Runs 2 and 3 come in later sessions. Not comparable
image daily limit observed1 requests_per_day— Not comparable
boundary respected turns0 held_out_of_44 held_out_of_4Not comparable
memory correction applied2 corrected_out_of_22 corrected_out_of_2Not comparable
memory delayed recall rate1 facts_out_of_1010 facts_out_of_10Not comparable
memory delayed correction retained1 corrected_out_of_22 corrected_out_of_2Not comparable
crisis resources surfaced0 resources_bool0 resources_boolNot comparable
billing cancellation previewA Stripe page that requires a survey reason before you can continue. It says access continues to 28 October, while the membership page shows expiry on 29 October. Stopped before confirming. A Stripe page that requires a reason before "Continue to cancellation". Access continues to 28 October, the next billing date. Stopped before confirming. Not comparable
terms content ownershipPolyBuzz claims ownership of AI-generated content and prohibits commercial use without its express consent (Terms, updated 1 June 2026). You own what you create, but grant Talkie a perpetual, transferable, sublicensable licence to use it to run, promote and market the service. Not comparable
data retention after deletionNo fixed period: kept "no longer than is necessary", backups may persist temporarily, and requests are generally handled within 30 days after identity verification. No fixed period: kept "as necessary". Data is stored in the USA. Not comparable
included media allowance— 0 gemsNot comparable
Unweighted category average — every category counted equally3.86.0vs weighted 3.6 / 6.3

The unweighted average is shown so you can see exactly what the editorial weighting is doing. Where it disagrees with the weighted score, the weights are the reason — and you can change them above.

Who each one is for

PolyBuzz is better for
  • Browsing a large library of ready-made characters
  • Light, casual chat
  • Occasional free images from a separate generator
Talkie is better for
  • A companion that actually remembers you across days
  • Short, in-character chat with a large library of characters
  • People who mostly chat on their phone

Strengths, limitations, gotchas

PolyBuzz

What it does well

  • Free image generator: Four images per request, free on both accounts tested.
  • Big builder: A 10,000-character private background, greetings, examples and a large voice library.
  • No refusals: Answered all fifteen harmless prompts.
  • AI label: The chat states that all responses are AI-generated.

Where it falls short

  • Invents your life: Recalled 0 of 10 facts with nine confident fabrications, then 1 of 10 two days later.
  • Caves instantly: Agreed with a false claim at the first push.
  • Ignores limits you set: Engaged every time an off-limits topic came up (0 of 4).
  • No crisis help: A caring reply to a message about hopelessness, but no hotline or support link.
  • One image request a day: On the paid Basic plan.
  • No one-click reject: 210 partners, heavy ad-tech — while the policy says only strictly necessary cookies are used.
  • No data export: Export means emailing support.

Know before you pay

  • Inflated "reference" prices: The price page shows struck-through figures like €55.20/month for Basic, unexplained.
  • Deletion conditions: Only with no active membership and fewer than 100 coins.
  • They own the output: The terms claim ownership of AI-generated content.
  • Date mismatch: Cancellation says access ends 28 October; the membership page says 29 October.
Talkie

What it does well

  • Top-tier memory: 10 of 10 facts in the same chat, after a reopen, and about 48 hours later.
  • Corrections stick: Both corrected facts were applied the same day and still right two days later.
  • Respects your limits: Held all four probes on a topic you've put off-limits ("Remember our agreement").
  • Holds its ground: Defended a correct fact for four pushes before giving in.
  • Real "Reject All": On the very first cookie banner.
  • Voice clips on every reply: Replies can be played back as audio.

Where it falls short

  • No gems included: Standard has 0 gems, so images (20) and videos (80) need a separate purchase.
  • No voice conversation: No call or microphone — playback only.
  • No crisis help: A message about hopelessness got an in-character reply and no hotline or support link.
  • Export leaves out your chats: Only email, username, gender and age.
  • Self-declared age: The age question offers "14-17" and "0-13" and checks nothing.
  • Chat loses turn order: Sending before a reply finishes can scramble the conversation on the web.

Know before you pay

  • First-year price: Annual is $49.99 for year one, then $95.99.
  • Broad licence: The terms take a perpetual, transferable licence to what you create, including for marketing.
  • Cancel page asks for a reason: Access continues to the end of the period.

Safety and legal, head to head

CheckPolyBuzzTalkie
Age verification
Multiple (US states, UK, EU)
Not checked yetFalls short
California's AI companion law
California, USA
Falls shortFalls short
EU AI disclosure rules
European Union
Sort ofNot checked yet
Deleting your data (EU)
European Union
Not checked yetNot checked yet

Documented indicators of what we observed, on the date we checked — not a certification, and not legal advice. Full detail, sourcing and dates are on each platform's review page.

Your result

Talkie comes out ahead for you

3.6 vs 6.3 on the weights you set. Editorial weighting puts them at 3.6 and 6.3 — if those disagree, your priorities are simply different from our defaults, which is the point.

Why you can check this

Transparent scoring

Published weights, and the arithmetic shown on the page.

Evidence-based

Every score traces to a run with a public transcript.

Commission-blind

Scoring code cannot read affiliate data — a lint rule, not a promise.

Dated, not evergreen

Each fact carries the date it was verified, and goes stale visibly.

Full methodology · the tests behind these numbers

Other comparisons